![\"irgc-300\"](\"http:\/\/www.irandemocratic.org\/public_html\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/irgc-300.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nThe Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei<\/i><\/p>\n
The New York Times<\/i> reported (\u201cIranian Hackers Attack State Dept. via Social Media Accounts,\u201d Nov. 24, 2015) American officials and private security groups \u201csay they see a surge in sophisticated computer espionage by Iran, culminating in a series of cyberattacks against State Department officials over the past month.\u201d<\/p>\n
According to the paper<\/a>, Iran has been identifying specific State Department employees who focus on Iran and the Middle East and hacking into their email and social media accounts. One anonymous senior U.S. official called the attacks \u201csubtle\u201d noting the Islamic Republic\u2019s savvy use of social media, such as Facebook, to target young U.S. officials.<\/p>\n The attacks, the Times<\/i> notes, are \u201cnothing new,\u201d having begun in the latter years of the Bush administration and proceeded since then to target U.S. agencies, banks and citizens and Saudi and Qatari energy entities, among others.<\/p>\n The New York Times<\/i> reported Iranian cyber-attacks transitioned in 2014 from attempting to disrupt, degrade and destroy targets to \u201cspear phishing\u201d for espionage.<\/p>\n \u201cBeginning May 2014, researchers found evidence that Iranian hackers were targeting Iranian dissidents, and later policy makers, senior military personnel and defense contractors in the United States, England and Israel, according to a report by iSight Partners, a computer intelligence firm in Dallas.\u201d<\/p>\n The attacks increased, reaching more than 1,500 attempts at the time of their apex in May 2015. Just prior to talks between the U.S. and Iran over the latter\u2019s alleged illegal nuclear program, Iranian cyber-attacks began \u201cprobing critical infrastructure networks in what appeared to be reconnaissance for cyberattacks meant to cause physical damage,\u201d the Times<\/i> noted. However, as negotiations between the United States and Iran began, attacks against the United States noticeably dropped off, although attacks against Israel did not.<\/p>\n In August, two weeks after the Iran deal was reached, Iranian cyberattacks resumed. Researchers from Check Point, an Israeli cybersecurity company, were able to hack into the Iranian hackers\u2019 target list. It \u201cincluded 1,600 individuals, from scholars, scientists, chief executives and ministry officials to education institutes, journalists and human rights activists across the globe.\u201d<\/p>\n This renewed flurry of Iranian cyberattacks was predicted in an April 2015 report by American Enterprise Institute scholars Frederick Kagan and Tommy Stiansen (The growing cyberthreat from Iran: The initial report of Project Pistachio Harvest). This study<\/a> noted that since the beginning of 2014 to March 2015, Iranian cyberattacks had increased by 128 percent.<\/p>\n AEI stated \u201cIranian companies, including some under international sanctions and some affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and global terrorist organizations like Hezbollah, are hosting websites, mail servers, and other IT systems in the United States, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and elsewhere. Simply by registering and paying a fee, Iranian security services and ordinary citizens can gain access to advanced computer systems and software that the West has been trying to prevent them from getting at all.\u201d<\/p>\n The report further noted \u201chundreds of thousands of domains registered to Iranian people or companies\u201d are \u201ca result of Western failures to enforce IT sanctions and regulations governing technology transfers\u201d\u2014and are sometimes used to conduct cyberattacks against the U.S. and its allies.<\/p>\n News coverage and commentary about renewed Iranian cyberattacks has been sparse.<\/p>\n The Washington Post<\/i>, in an November 18 online-only column by<\/a> guest bloggers Dina Esfandiary and Ariane Tabatabai, predicted that attacks will increase (\u201cIran\u2019s cyberattacks are likely to increase. Here\u2019s why\u201d). The Wall Street Journal<\/i> (\u201cU.S. Detects Flurry of Iranian Hacking,\u201d November 4) and The New York Times<\/i>, alone apparently of major print outlets, reported the Iranian hacking increase.<\/p>\n Publications that had reported on the Iran nuclear deal\u2014and endorsed it editorially, such as The Baltimore Sun<\/i> and Los Angeles Times<\/i>, among others, did not cover the Iranian attacks.<\/p>\n USA Today<\/i> didn\u2019t report the renewed attacks, despite having run<\/a> a prescient op-ed by Ilan Berman of D.C.-based think tank American Foreign Policy Council in 2014 that called for paying close attention to the Islamic Republic\u2019s cyber activities (\u201cSony hack gives cover to Iran; With eyes on North Korea, growing threat from Tehran gets overlooked,\u201d December 30).<\/p>\n A little coverage in three major outlets; where was the rest of it?<\/p>\n News reference:<\/p>\n http:\/\/blog.camera.org\/archives\/2015\/11\/iran_increases_cyberattacks_ag.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"